Skip to main content

CONSENT PETITION IN SUCCESSION CASE

 

DISTRICT: NORTH 24-PARGANAS

 

IN THE COURT OF THE LEARNED DISTRICT DELEGATE AT BARRACKPORE

                                                           

Act XXXIX (Succession) Case No. …………. of 2012
 
In the Matter of

An application for giving consent

 

And

 

In the Matter of

Sum of Rs. 1,30,000/- plus interest

 

And

 

In the Matter of

Gita Kairi

                          ………… Applicant

 

And

 

In the Matter of

1.      Ganesh Kairi;

2.      Ramesh Kairi;

3.      Dinesh Kairi;

Nos. 1 to 3 sons of Late Siddhi Kairi;

4.   Saraswati Bhagat, wife of Sri ……………… ………………………………….., daughter of Late Siddhi Kairri

all of Chhoto Jonpur, Naihati, Kampa Chakla, Bijpur, P. O. Kanchrapara, P. S. Bijpur, District North 24-Parganas, Pin 741 250;

        …………………….. Petitioners

 

The humble petition of the petitioners above-named Most Respectfully

 

Sheweth:

 

1.                  That the applicant, Smt. Gita Kairi is the wife of Late Siddhi Kairi of Chhoto Jonpur, Naihati, Kampa Chakla, Bijpur, District North 24-Parganas, Pin 741 250, who died intestate on 23/10/2005 leaving behind the applicant and under-mentioned legal heirs and successors.

 

2.                  That the applicant filed the above Act XXXIX Case No. …………… of 2012 before The Learned District Delegate at Barrackpore, District North 24-Parganas.

 

3.                  That the petitioner nos. 1 to 3 are the sons and the petitioner no. 4 is the daughter of said Siddhi Kairi, since deceased and are governed by Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

 

4.                  That the petitioners have no objection, if the instant Succession Case is decreed in favour of the petitioner.

 

5.                  That under the aforesaid circumstances, necessary Orders may be passed so that the instant Succession Case is granted in favour of the applicant.

 

6.                  That the application is made bona fide and for the ends of justice.

 

Under the aforesaid circumstances, Your petitioners most humbly pray that Your Honour may graciously be pleased to grant the applicant the Succession Certificate to collect the total debts plus interest thereon mentioned in Scheduled of Assets hereunder and/or to pass such other further Order/Orders as to Your Honour may deem fit and proper

 

And Your petitioners as in duty-bound shall ever pray.

 

AFFIDAVIT

 

I, Sri Dinesh Kairi, son of Late Siddhi Kairi, aged about ………… years, by faith Hindu, by occupation ………………………….. of Chhoto Jonpur, Naihati, Kampa Chakla, Bijpur, P. O. Kanchrapara, P. S. Bijpur, District North 24-Parganas, Pin 741 250, do hereby solemnly affirm and say as follows: -

 

1.                  That I am the petitioner no. 3 in the instant case, I am well acquainted with the facts and circumstances of this case and as such I am competent to swear this affidavit on behalf of myself as well as on behalf of the other petitioners.

 

2.      That the statements made in Paragraphs 1 to 5 above are true to my knowledge and I the rest are my humble submissions before This Hon’ble Court.

 

 


Prepared in my office

Petitioner

 

Identified by me

Advocate

 

 

Advocate

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

OBJECTIONS OF RESPONDENTS TO DELAY CONDONATION APPLICATION FILED BY PETITIONER

  OBJECTIONS OF 2ND TO 4TH RESPONDENTS TO DELAY CONDONATION APPLICATION FILED BY PETITIONER:- 1. The interim application is not maintainable since the affidavit accompanied the application does not speaks truth and its vague and not specific in disclosing accurate reasons for the absence of petitioner/plaintiff in the days wherein court has scheduled to plaintiff evidence. 2. The affidavit consist of mere allegations un-supported by documents, hence liable to be dismissed. The written statement and objections filed by these respondents to the main petition be read as part and parcel of this objections to delay condonation application. 3. The matter of condonation of delay, it is an established position that every day's delay has to be explained and a person who seeks the exercise of the discretion to condone the delay in his favour cannot run away by making a mere general statement or mere allegation unsupported by document or mere passing of his laches upon his advocate. 4...
Post a Comment
Read more

"As Is" and "As Available"

  " As Is" and "As Available " " As available " applies to goods and services, including those provided online. ... With apps and websites, " As Available " indicates contractual standards only when the product or service is available. “As Is” alerts a buyer in a sales contract that they accept the purchased item, be it real estate, animals, automobiles or appliances, in its present condition. It also assumes the buyer has a right to inspect the property first so they can assess any defects and make an informed decision. “As available” applies to goods and services, including those provided online. At its most simple definition, it refers to products in stock or real estate that remain on the market. Once purchased, there are no guarantees because the product is no longer available. It also refers to store or office hours with a bricks-and-mortar business. With apps and websites, “As Available” indicates contractual standards only when the produc...
Post a Comment
Read more

Quashing a False 498a FIR

  Quashing a False 498a FIR Quashing of FIR is a tough matter ! Courts generally are reluctant to interfere at the stage of investigation and only very strong grounds + persuasive arguments can make a bench sit up and taking a 482 matter seriously. FIR’s can be quashed if they an abuse of process of law/prima facie don’t disclose any offence or are inherently improbable - If you are thinking about quashing of FIR u/s 498a/406. These are the grounds/list of judgments of quashing that would help bolster your plea : GROUNDS FOR QUASHING IN A 498a/406/34 IPC MATTER • BECAUSE  Section 482 of the Cr.PC  categorically saves the inherent power of High Court to make such orders as may be necessary to give effect to any order this Code, or to prevent abuse of the process of any court or otherwise to secure the ends of justice. In the instant case it is pertinent in the ends of justice and to prevent an abuse of the process of law that the impugned FIR be quashed. • BECAUSE ...
Post a Comment
Read more