Skip to main content

Cross Examination pattern on ME documents

 

Cross Examination pattern on ME documents

 

ME 1 : appln from of the agent

a)     This is true that this a Appointment letter of the agent only … say yes or no ?

b)    This is also true that it is written on the appointment letter that the agent can mobilize business  in All India level ….. say yes or no ?

c)     Effective Date is manipulated on the letter ….. say yes or no ?

d)    This is also true that this letter was signed by the Chief Manager himself … say yes or no ?

e)     This is true that this letter is printed on the Letter head of the company …. say yes or no ?

f)      This is true that this an application of the agent… say yes or no ?

g)     This is also true that on the reverse side of the application, some official of uti amc has initialed / signed

h)    This piece of paper is terms and condition of the agency signed by the agent …. say yes or no ?

i)       This a related papers of the agents details and signed by the agent only …say yes or no ?

j)       This piece of paper contains the AMFI code no issued by amfi  ….. say yes or no ?

k)     This is a copy of the pan card of the agent   …..  say yes or no ?

                                                                                                                

ME 2 : email of sng to vinaya prasad

a)     Look at the subject line … it is a Continuation of the mail … that has not been attached with this mail or produced to me during the proceedings …. say yes or no ?

b)    This does not show the any url address  …. Yes or no ?

c)     This is a Fabricated documents ….. say yes or no ?

 

ME – 4 : confession letter of agent

a)     This sig is not matching with other sig in application form  … Say Yes or No ?

b)    This letter is not addressed to UTI AMC Ltd…. Say Yes or No ?

c)     Going through your own document , please tell me whether there is any mention of ARN code on the letter …..  say yes or no ?

d)    Is there any inward no on it …. Say Yes or No ?

e)     Is there any  office seal on it …. Say Yes or No ?

f)      Is it authenticated by any other officials or not ?  Say Yes or No ?

g)     Is it received By speed post or courier ? say yes or no

h)    I am saying that ME 4 is fabricated document .. say yes or no ?

ME 5  : prasanta ghosh’s mail

a)     Who has printed this mail and when ?

b)    Where is the continuation of the mail ?

c)     Any proof Whether really PG has written to RS cc to SLP

d)    Content did not say when RS Subramanian spoke to PG- when did the telephonic conversation took place ?

 

ME 6   Confession letter of SNG

a)     Who is the addressee of the confession letter?

b)    Did you find that such purported confession letter bear any mention of  UTI AMC Ltd  ?  Say Yes or No ?

c)     Is there any word “ UTI AMC Ltd “ in the alleged confession letter ? say yes or no ?

d)    Did the sig of the person who has written this purported confession letter bear any seal of UTI AMC Ltd or his designation ? yes or or not ?

e)     Did such confession letter written on any office letter head of UTI AMC ltd or not ?  Say Yes or No ?

f)      Are you Aware of the FIR lodged by s n Gayen against ……..?

 

ME 7 & ME 8 : axis & hdfc statement

 

a)     Is this purported statement printed on Axis bank letter head ?

b)    Does it bear any seal  and signature of the bank officials ? Say Yes or No ?

c)     Whether it has been verified or authenticated by anybody from the bank officials ?  Say Yes or No ?

d)    Whether is it possible to identify  the person’s name who has printed the statement  ?  Say Yes or No ?

e)     Whether is it possible to make the statement  on excel sheet or not ?  Say Yes or No ?

f)      Who has highlighted on some of the transactions ?

g)     There is no seal in original form in the statement ? Say Yes or No ?

h)    There is no signature in original form in the statement ? Say Yes or No ?

 

 

ME 9 : statement of investment thru bank

 

a)     Bears no seal and signature of the person who made it

b)    I am saying that this is a piece of fabricated document? say yes or no ?

c)     Statement : bear so seal and signature of the person of any person whosever.  Say Yes or No ?

 

ME 10  : Confession statement of Prasanta Ghosh

 

a)     I am telling you it is a Manufactured document … say yes or no ?

b)    Confession letter  does not bear any seal of the company or designation of the person …. Say yes or  no ?

c)     Name of the Addressee  is absent in this letter? say yes or no ?

d)    Written content was not in a letter head of the company uti amc ltd ? say yes or no ?

e)     In the entire letter is there any mention of uti amc ltd ? Say Yes or No ?

f)      How has it been received – by speed post or courier ? Say Yes or No ?

g)     I am telling you that other pieces of papers are also fabricated? say yes or no ?

h)    This is also Not verified / authenticated by any body of the company whosever ?

 

ME 11 : list of reimbursement of marketing expenses

 

a)     Ist page of ME 11 (summary sheet) – it is piece of paper – it does not bear any seal and signature of the person who have prepared it … say yes or no ?

b)    I am telling you it is fabricated documents … say yes or no?

c)     This is true that it bears the signature of shri ashish sethi, country head? Yes or no ?

d)    It is also true that it was signed by ashish sethi on 21st may 2010? Yes or no?

e)     Is it true that the office note is initialed / signed by the CMO … yes or no?

f)      It is also true that this office note is a mere proposal for reimbursement

g)     It is a proposal for reimbursement of marketing expenses only

 

ð Other evidence : how to produce the additional papers we have collected from office –to check up with Ashok da

 

ME 12  & ME 13 : investment / declaration statement

 

ME 14 : client investment details :

 

a)     I am telling you it is fabricated documents … say yes or no?

b)    It does not Bear any seal and signature of the person who made it .. say yes or no?

c)     Written content was not in a letter head of the company uti amc ltd ? say yes or no ?

d)    it has been verified or authenticated by anybody from the company officials?  Say Yes or No ?

e)     Client has filled up the form and put his seal and signature thereon … say yes or no ?

f)      This paper does not bear any seal and signature on it… say yes or no ?

g)     This is also Manufactured documents ? Say Yes or No ?

h)    Also ajit kuthirummal has verified the paper on being satisfied with the  appln form  and put his signature and seal on it .  say yes or no   ?

 

 

ð Other evidence : how to produce the additional papers we have collected from office –to check up with Ashok da

 

 

Other things carefully to be established thru cross examination that :

 

ü To establish  that there was no any investigation took place

ü If so where are those papers that the competent authority has authorized the persons to conduct the investigation against Mr. Gayen

ü Have they got any complaint letter from any client against Mr. Gayen that he is not a good person ? that he pose himself as an agent

ü In case they  received the complaint letter from the client , have they  produced it to the EO in original ?

ü If no, are they just producing it to EO just now ?

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

OBJECTIONS OF RESPONDENTS TO DELAY CONDONATION APPLICATION FILED BY PETITIONER

  OBJECTIONS OF 2ND TO 4TH RESPONDENTS TO DELAY CONDONATION APPLICATION FILED BY PETITIONER:- 1. The interim application is not maintainable since the affidavit accompanied the application does not speaks truth and its vague and not specific in disclosing accurate reasons for the absence of petitioner/plaintiff in the days wherein court has scheduled to plaintiff evidence. 2. The affidavit consist of mere allegations un-supported by documents, hence liable to be dismissed. The written statement and objections filed by these respondents to the main petition be read as part and parcel of this objections to delay condonation application. 3. The matter of condonation of delay, it is an established position that every day's delay has to be explained and a person who seeks the exercise of the discretion to condone the delay in his favour cannot run away by making a mere general statement or mere allegation unsupported by document or mere passing of his laches upon his advocate. 4...

"As Is" and "As Available"

  " As Is" and "As Available " " As available " applies to goods and services, including those provided online. ... With apps and websites, " As Available " indicates contractual standards only when the product or service is available. “As Is” alerts a buyer in a sales contract that they accept the purchased item, be it real estate, animals, automobiles or appliances, in its present condition. It also assumes the buyer has a right to inspect the property first so they can assess any defects and make an informed decision. “As available” applies to goods and services, including those provided online. At its most simple definition, it refers to products in stock or real estate that remain on the market. Once purchased, there are no guarantees because the product is no longer available. It also refers to store or office hours with a bricks-and-mortar business. With apps and websites, “As Available” indicates contractual standards only when the produc...

Quashing a False 498a FIR

  Quashing a False 498a FIR Quashing of FIR is a tough matter ! Courts generally are reluctant to interfere at the stage of investigation and only very strong grounds + persuasive arguments can make a bench sit up and taking a 482 matter seriously. FIR’s can be quashed if they an abuse of process of law/prima facie don’t disclose any offence or are inherently improbable - If you are thinking about quashing of FIR u/s 498a/406. These are the grounds/list of judgments of quashing that would help bolster your plea : GROUNDS FOR QUASHING IN A 498a/406/34 IPC MATTER • BECAUSE  Section 482 of the Cr.PC  categorically saves the inherent power of High Court to make such orders as may be necessary to give effect to any order this Code, or to prevent abuse of the process of any court or otherwise to secure the ends of justice. In the instant case it is pertinent in the ends of justice and to prevent an abuse of the process of law that the impugned FIR be quashed. • BECAUSE ...